What impressed me most about the quality of the Corvette's cabin were the gear and drive mode selectors. At first glance, the shifter looks similar to what you'd find in the Acura NSX. The Corvette's gear selector is metal, about half the size, and feels like something off a high-end stereo. As does the well-weighted mode-selector puck. Think of a Marantz tuner from the 1970s, back when "American Made" was king.
Everything is laid out well, too. "Not only is the interior clever, and attractive, the ergonomics are very good," road test editor Chris Walton said, "but having a small screen, close to the driver, also enables you to rest your hand on top and thumb the touchscreen without the unsteadiness you'd have without the perch."
I love the squared steering wheel (a few others did not) and the jet-age homage of its design, though there was debate about the cabin's overall design. Some judges felt as if there was a bit too much bling, but others liked it. As for the stream of buttons that make up the HVAC controls and "puts up a wall," to quote Walton, between the driver and the passenger/glove box, most judges felt that these controls are of the set-and-forget variety. Plus, you just don't notice them from behind the wheel. You do notice a couple inexplicable cheap outs, especially if you're our executive editor Mark Rechtin. He despises the plastic cupholders. "How much would improving them have cost Chevy? Five bucks a unit?"
If the new Corvette has a weakness, it's the exterior design. The judges' opinions ranged from harsh (MacKenzie: "Bill Mitchell would be spinning in his grave. ") to damning with faint praise (Walton: "Fine from 100 feet. ").
The main issue: As you get closer to the vehicle, you see tributaries of pointless lines going off in every direction. This sort of sloppy linework—folds and creases that exist for the sake of existence—first appeared on the previous generation. Did the Corvette design team want to link the two products, to maybe help convince current Corvette owners to trade up for the newer model? Perhaps. Whatever the reason, although the car's shape is good, the details are not. However, that just means that Chevy has a real opportunity in a few years with the midcycle refresh. As our guest judge and former
Jaguar design boss Ian Callum said, "Great car to drive. Shame about the styling."
Much of the credit is due to the quick-shifting eight-speed dual-clutch transmission. Big takeaway: We've yet to test a quicker naturally aspirated, rear-drive production car to 60 mph, price be damned. The C8 did great in the quarter mile, too, covering 1,320 feet in 11.1 seconds at 123.2 mph. That beats the direct competitor Porsche 911 Carrera S by 0.1 second. A win, however, is a win; the Corvette is quicker than the Porsche.
Braking from 60 mph takes place in 97 feet, which is world class. The C8's figure-eight time of 23.3 seconds is quick but behind the aforementioned Porsche (22.7 seconds) and stuff like the Chevy Camaro SS 1LE (22.9 seconds). I'll go ahead and blame the awkward brake-by-wire system. We all agreed there's more work to do here. "It's near-impossible to accurately modulate the braking effort in Track mode, the system defaulting to instant-on ABS intervention at pedal speeds and weights a steel-braked 911 would shrug off," MacKenzie said.
But those are modest complaints. The C8 wins our top award on the strength of how it drives. "Phenomenal performance," news editor Alex Nishimoto said. He's right. While conducting limit testing of the entire field at the
Hyundai Motor Group California Proving Ground, I knew the Corvette deserved to be a finalist—but my mind remained open to other vehicles taking the top spot.
It was after cruising the twists and turns of Cameron Road on our finalist loop near Tehachapi that I became convinced the mid-engine Corvette had to be our winner. "It's so easy to drive," editor-in-chief Ed Loh said. That's perhaps the No. 1 big change from behind the wheel of the C8 compared to the C7. You can just go for it and attack a road with abandon. I loved how potent, aggressive, and in control I felt. Total confidence.
Many judges mentioned that there's a touch of understeer. Note, I did not say complained about said phenomenon, just mentioned that it's there. Loh noted that dialing in some understeer is a "sensible strategy," as this will be many owners' first time driving a mid-engine car, and understeer keeps the nose pointing in a straight line when you push the throttle farther than your skills allow. Let me stress that we're talking a skosh, a pinch, a tiny amount of understeer. We're just saying the car isn't tail happy. "The genius of this Corvette is it feels benign to beginners," MacKenzie said, "but it's not boring for experts."
As a group of experts, we collectively loved driving the thing. "The sound is just thrilling when you accelerate, punctuating each shift change, sounding and feeling fabulous," Priddle said. Theodore agreed: "The C8 is very easy to drive, with very high capabilities that most owners will not reach." Nishimoto added, "Happiness is having a small-block V-8 rumbling behind you." Rechtin called the C8 "something that can be driven very fast, all day, but you emerge completely rested and relaxed." And MotorTrend en Español managing editor Miguel Cortina said, "Finally, a Corvette that I enjoy driving."
To become a
MotorTrend Car of the Year, you have to punch hard against our six key criteria. To quickly break it down, the new Corvette fares worst in terms of
advancement of design. However, as a car's interior is included in this metric, the C8 did OK.
The 2020 Corvette's engineering excellence is through the removable roof; it features world-class performance combined with shockingly good ride comfort and noise levels. Chevy's top dog also scores big in terms of performance of intended function, assuming that intended function is to be a daily-driven supercar.
Safety is trickier with the Corvette, as neither IIHS nor NHTSA have or will crash-test it, but based on safety scores for GM's other recent offerings, we'll give Chevrolet the benefit of the doubt here. As for efficiency, the small-block has cylinder deactivation to loaf along while powered by just four cylinders.
Value is where the C8 goes off the charts. Why would you buy a BMW M4 for the same money? Why would you spend half again as much for an equivalent 911? Besides a badge, what does a Ferrari give you? And just wait until the more powerful Corvette iterations show up.
Few cars change the automotive landscape, forcing other manufacturers to react, as the status quo will no longer do. It's déjà vu all over again, again, folks. Chevy is selling a supercar for sports car prices. As I told a wealthy supercar collector friend of mine, "If I were you, I'd buy three." Or as MacKenzie put it, "Hallelujah! A real, honest-to-god, mid-engine supercar for the price of a Corvette." Great job, Chevrolet.